First blog blog post first ideas scatter

Thoughts on – 

The potential of online object based learning activities to support the teaching of intersectional environmentalism in art and higher education:

  • The ROSE system (p193) as a method of analysing artifacts was incredibly interesting and I would be keen to use it in relation to my teaching more  – a kind of base level critical function to analyse everything.
  • ROSE as a system to analyse a text about the ideology of  flowers was a genius level pun.
  • Fantastic idea as a way to introduce students to critical theory relating to colonialism and the environment – also having attended a couple of seminars that Judy ran with Phil on the ideology of the Latin font and Medieval Marginalia I can only begin to imagine how engaging this would have been if they had done it IRL
  • It very much smelt of COVID and although I can imagine it being one of the best things for students to have engaged with at that time, I also can’t imagine it being better than if they had done it IRL 

Thoughts on – 

The first workshop session:

  • God it felt good to be a student again
  • Metaphorical/ Analogous exercises are useful up to a point – if you always have to have the meaning of the experience explained after each exercise then it negates the ‘natural’ realisation of an idea
  • However I do really believe in the idea of learning through actively doing as opposed to always passively listening
  • However if the doing is always to the end of reaching a preordained explanation, then is it in any way more free than just receiving a passive explanation?
  • Like the passive and active Fathers in Zizek and Lacian Psychology
  • Or are these very thoughts I am having as an example of the success of the teaching method?
  • I certainly struggled to absorb the passive information about the case study structure

Ideas and areas for case study:

  • Developing the kinetic workshops I run – The politics of the body and technology
  • Techno Bodies and the Body Politic  – Pedagogically, Academically and Technically 
  • Making mechanics, coding, electronics and coding accessible to all students
  • Techno Bodies and the Body Politic – contextualise it within academia
  • Fostering a real community of practice and support network
  • Creating an online resource for students to access and share ideas
  • Embedding economic access into the methodologies
  • Is it possible for Online Object based learning or is that an oxymoron?
  • Is it possible to use Online Object based learning for what I do?
  • How would a more academic workshop function?
  • How would a more technical workshop function?
  • Do I need to delineate?
  • Fostering online engagement without it being data collection?
  • How could I incorporate ideas around the environment into it?
  • How could I incorporate more specific political engagement into it?
  • Can I incorporate the ROSE method into my teaching?

What do I want to get out of the observations

  • Is it a good idea to have my kind of boss observing me?
  • How can I support the students who fade during a session / is it necessary
  • Balance of 1 to 1 and group support/learning during a session
  • Balance of Context – Theory – Making
  • How accessible is the content, context, and method of my workshops
  • Inclusion,
  • Pacing
  • Longevity
  • Building of Community of practice
  • Fostering of online Resource and Sharing
  • Vitebsk ideology

This entry was posted in Uncategorised. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *